Gas Mileage - I Knew We Had The Technology

How does 235 miles per gallon sound? Impossible you say? Think again.
According to Wired.com, VW's new "One Liter" car is bringing new meaning to the term fuel efficiency. The new concept car's body is made entirely of carbon fiber which allows for a total vehicle weight of only 660 pounds.
Originally scheduled to launch in 2012, VW has decided ready the vehicle for market 2 years ahead of schedule. "They'll probably be built in the company's prototype shop, which has the capacity to build as many as 1,000 per year. That's not a lot, but it's enough to help VW get a lot of attention while showing how much light weight and an efficient engine can achieve."
As fuel prices continue to soar this type of vehicle is a welcome addition to the road. The original concept car has a 1 cylinder, 8.5 horsepower engine but VW will probably add another cylinder to the production model which will surely cut fuel economy.


Here's the thing that always annoys me. Fuel economy is going to cost you. The One Liter is going to cost anywhere from $31,750 to $47,622. We need to make fuel efficient vehicles accessible to the masses if we are ever going to wean ourselves off of foreign oil. If only the upper-middle class to upper class can afford the vehicles, that is a small percentage of the cars on the road. But what about the new Smart car you say? Base models start out at about 12 grand. Yeah Ok, I'll give you that. But, you have to wait 9 months to get them. AND they aren't getting that great of gas mileage. 42mpg for the US models? The same cars are getting 70 mpg in Europe.

RJ Adams over at SparrowChat asks, "...why do foreign cars sold in America always produce poorer gas mileage figures than their European or Asian counterparts? The US Smart manages a figure over a third less, from the same 999cc turbo-charged engine?"
Very good question. I did some digging and it's true. Apples to apples Euro cars DO get better mileage. Is this due to the "imperial gallon" or are the cars in the US de-tuned in some way? Is it a conspiracy with the government and big oil? Adams says, "It makes no sense, unless one becomes incredibly cynical and dares to suggest a political element limiting the scope of non-American motor manufacturers?"
What about the EV1 from GM. That was a pretty big controversy. Some even called it a conspiracy. What about the VW 1.8 liter TDI? A car that was getting 50 mpg but they had to take it off the market a year ago to "re-engineer" it to conform to emission standards. No matter how you look at it. We DO have the technology to produce vehicles that get GREAT fuel mileage. Are we choosing NOT to make them? What are your thoughts?
Labels: politics, technology
 













 









7 Comments:
I've been waiting for the Smart Fortwo to come to the US for about 2 years because of the 70 mpg. The big difference between the foreign and US version is the foreign one is diesel.
"Diesel fuel has a higher energy density than gasoline. One gallon of diesel contains approximately 147,000 BTUs of energy, while a gallon of gasoline only has 125,000 BTUs. This means it takes more gasoline to equal the power output of diesel, making diesel engines more efficient per gallon of fuel burned. Also, because diesel engines use the more efficient direct fuel-injection method (fuel injected directly into cylinder) compared to the port fuel-injection setup in gas engines where gas is mixed with incoming air in the intake manifold, the diesel system has little wasted or unburned fuel."
Why isn't the US model diesel? Dunno. I bet it's just marketing image ("US consumers will NEVER buy a diesel car!")
I think your right. In the 80's people really got burned out on diesel. Diesel car owners in the north saw it as too much of a hassle to get blended fuel in the winter. The would just buy regular and the fuel system would gel up. However I think that it is making a comeback. I know I would buy a diesel. I wonder if it is worth the extra $1 per gallon though. Can someone do the math on that? I am not a numbers person. LOL
I have always wondered. Is diesel a more or less refined fuel?
I think also the US have much more harsh emissions restrictions to get around, and to make it comply they had to make changes for the US, cutting MPG. Dunno for sure though.
I'm no economic expert, but I would think auto companies could do just as well selling cars that are less expensive yet selling a lot more of them. Granted, the technology may be so new that it costs a little more to make them to begin with, but that should come down as technology gets better.
But at least these kinds of cars don't look stupid like they did in the early days. Talk about conspiracies, you'd think that someone deliberately made them look ugly so no one would buy them.
Big Pappa -
One way to look at it might be to use miles per dollar rather than miles per gallon. Let's assume regular is $4 per gallon and diesel is $5 (I don't really know what it is you said it was a dollar more...). And the US car gets 42 mpg while the European car gets 70 mpg.
The US car gets about 10.5 miles per dollar while the EU gets about 14 miles per dollar. That is about 33% more miles per dollar in the case you just described. Which means it probably makes economic sense in this case, at least. Does that mean diesel isn't just for truckers and "outdoorsy" folks anymore? ;-)
I think it is not the difference between gas and diesel, but also the strict EPA and safety regulations that are imposed in the US. We are using more gas, but our emissions are less, and our cars are safer.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home